{"id":13583,"date":"2016-04-20T19:13:39","date_gmt":"2016-04-20T23:13:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/?p=13583"},"modified":"2016-04-21T08:09:38","modified_gmt":"2016-04-21T12:09:38","slug":"a-fearless-leader-the-story-of-elizabeth-horton-sheff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/2016\/04\/20\/a-fearless-leader-the-story-of-elizabeth-horton-sheff\/","title":{"rendered":"1989: A Fearless Leader: The Story of Elizabeth Horton Sheff"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_13585\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-13585\" style=\"width: 291px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/1024x1024.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-13585\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-13585 \" src=\"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/1024x1024-261x300.jpg\" alt=\"1024x1024\" width=\"291\" height=\"334\" srcset=\"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/1024x1024-261x300.jpg 261w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/1024x1024-768x883.jpg 768w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/1024x1024.jpg 891w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 291px) 100vw, 291px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-13585\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Elizabeth Horton Sheff and Milo Sheff, lead plaintiffs in the Sheff vs. O\u2019Neill case, speak to reporters outside the Connecticut Superior Court. Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ctpost.com\/local\/article\/Sheff-paid-price-for-victory-in-landmark-schools-6208949.php#photo-7835999\">CT Post<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The landmark Connecticut Supreme Court case, Sheff v. O\u2019Neill, filed in 1989 on behalf of children in the Hartford school district, was monumental in working towards erasing segregation in Hartford schools. This case was filed on the basis that Hartford children, who were overwhelmingly Black and Hispanic, were receiving an unfair public education because of the racial and socioeconomic segregation that separates the city from the suburbs<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u00a0[ref]Sheff v. O\u2019Neill complaint (Connecticut Superior Court 1989). Available from the Trinity College Digital Repository, Hartford, Connecticut (http:\/\/digitalrepository.trincoll.edu)[\/ref]. The suit, filed by the parents of these children, looked to desegregate the Hartford public school system. At the time of filing, lead plaintiff, Milo Sheff, was a ten year old Black child living in Hartford with his mother, Elizabeth Horton Sheff, and attended fourth grade at the Annie Fisher School[ref]Ib.Id[\/ref]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. Along with the parents of the eighteen other plaintiffs, Elizabeth Horton Sheff worked tirelessly to ensure that all children in Connecticut would have access to equal schooling. Although this historic Connecticut school integration case is named for her son, Elizabeth Horton Sheff originally became apart of the case by accident, yet over time grew to become its most vocal activist.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">While some might call her an \u201caccidental plaintiff\u201d since she was not initially supposed to attend the community meeting discussing the racial isolation in Hartford schools, Elizabeth Horton Sheff\u2019s work for Connecticut children is nothing short of remarkable. Even though she did not have a history of being involved in education inequality issues, she was a long time activist for \u201cjustice for people with HIV\/AIDS, housing security, food security, and the anti-apartheid movement\u201d and prior to her involvement in the case, had always been an extremely civic minded person[ref]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sheff, Elizabeth Horton. Oral history interview on Sheff v. O\u2019Neill (with video) by Candace Simpson for the Cities, Suburbs, and Schools Project, July 28, 2011.Available from the Trinity College Digital Repository, Hartford Connecticut (http:\/\/digitalrepository.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/).[\/ref].\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Elizabeth Horton Sheff grew up in the former Charter Oak Housing Project, which she \u201clovingly refers to as the&#8230;Wal-Mart plaza on Flatbush Avenue,\u201d a neighborhood that had \u201call different families, racial ethnic families, West Indian, Hispanic, Italian, Asian\u2026 [and] what made it so very special was that families knew families and took care of each other\u2019s children[ref]Ib.Id[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> While she might have grown up in a single parent household where her mother worked a lot of long hours, she notes that growing up in a community where people cared about each other led her to have a wonderful childhood. She describes her mother as a woman who \u201cworked very hard to ensure that [they] didn\u2019t understand how very poor [they] were and\u2026 that is the basis that led [them] all to be confident youth and person who have excelled in adulthood[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Elizabeth Horton Sheff\u2019s prior training as an activist helped shape her involvement in the Sheff case. Much of her training comes from her work as the Vice President of the Westbrook Village Tenants\u2019 Association, which is a public housing development that she raised her children in in the northwest corner of the city[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> When the president of the association was invited to discuss the growing racial isolation in the city schools by civil rights public interest attorneys and local attorney, John Brittain, she asked Elizabeth to attend instead due to fear of some political pushback since she had a child in the Project Choice program. Elizabeth agreed to go because of her interest in public education and take some notes for her friend and as she says fondly, \u201c23 years later, I am still taking notes[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/player.vimeo.com\/video\/27298100\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\" title=\"Elizabeth Horton Sheff, July 28, 2011\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lead Plaintiff Elizabeth Horton Sheff describes her involvement in the Sheff vs. O\u2019Neill (1989).\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Source: <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vimeo.com\/27298100\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trinity College Digital Repository<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">At the meeting, \u201cthe lawyers highlighted the growing racial and economic isolation and resulting disparities in educational outcomes faced by children in the Hartford public school system[ref]Sheff, Elizabeth Horton. &#8220;Sheff v. O\u2019Neill: The Struggle Continues against School Segregation and Unequal Opportunity.&#8221; <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Voices in Urban Education<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, 2004, 16-21.[\/ref]<\/span>.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> What Elizabeth Horton Sheff heard at the meeting changed her life and immediately she knew she wanted to be more than just a notetaker for a friend. That night she learned that 91% of Hartford\u2019s students were members of minority groups compared to less than 4% in Avon, 3% in Canton, 4% in Suffield, 6% in Simsbury, and 5% in Glastonbury[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> While she knew that she lived in a segregated area, she did not realize it was this extreme. She did not realize that 48% of Hartford\u2019s kids came from poor families, compared to the just 2% in West Hartford and 1.5% in Glastonbury[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> When the lawyers discussed the scores of the Connecticut Mastery test to give proof of these disparities one fact \u201cstill burns in [Elizabeth Horton Sheff\u2019s] mind: in 1989, 74% of students in the eighth grade in Hartford public schools needed remedial reading services[ref]Ib.Id[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Time and again, as Elizabeth Horton Sheff tells her story with remarkable consistency, she says that to her this did not mean that 74% of students were failing, but rather that the system was failing 74% of our children[ref]Ib.Id[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> She notes that she loves to read and is a mother who always reads to her children, and she was \u201cdumbstruck by the reality that these children could reach the eighth grade without being able to read[ref]Ib.Id[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> After this meeting and hearing the alarming statistics, she knew she had to go home and talk to Milo about getting involved. After Milo attended the next meeting, he agreed to sign on to be considered as a plaintiff for the case, as did many other families. All the families were interviewed and the lawyers picked ten to join the case, including the Sheff family. After a second interview, Milo and Elizabeth were asked to be the named plaintiffs. For the lawyers this was an easy choice. Not only did they have Milo who was a \u201chandsome kid, like a little angel,\u201d but they also had his mother who they deemed \u201cperfect\u201d and someone who was so committed to fighting for justice that they felt \u201clucky\u201d to have her as a part of their team[ref]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Eaton, Susan. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The children in room E4: American education on trial<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. Algonquin Books, 2009.[\/ref].<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Milo agreed to be a plaintiff in the Sheff case because of the inequities a<\/span>nd isolation he was seeing in his own school and the city schools around him. Even though Milo had never had any terrible instances in his school that his mother could not handle, it was apparent to both Milo and Elizabeth Horton Sheff that there were children in the Hartford public schools who were not being given the best education possible.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_13597\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-13597\" style=\"width: 269px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012.jpeg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-13597\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-13597 \" src=\"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012-683x1024.jpeg\" alt=\"Portrait of Milo Sheff and Elizabeth Horton Sheff-- lead plaintiffs in the Landmark Sheff vs. O\u2019Neill case Photo by Michael McAndrews \/ Hartford Courant\" width=\"269\" height=\"404\" srcset=\"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012-683x1024.jpeg 683w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012-200x300.jpeg 200w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012-768x1152.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012.jpeg 1365w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 269px) 100vw, 269px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-13597\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Portrait of Milo Sheff and Elizabeth Horton Sheff&#8211; lead plaintiffs in the Landmark Sheff vs. O\u2019Neill case Photo by Michael McAndrews \/ <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courant.com\/opinion\/editorials\/hc-sheff-v-oneill-a-look-back-20140612-012-photo.html\">Hartford Courant<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>While \u00a0Milo and his mother were named the lead plaintiffs based on Elizabeth\u2019s status as a\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400\">single mother, person of color, and ability to be extremely articulate, they were not the only ones actively fighting for change[ref]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sheff, Elizabeth Horton. Oral history interview on Sheff v. O\u2019Neill (with video) by Candace Simpson for the Cities, Suburbs, and Schools Project, July 28, 2011.Available from the Trinity College Digital Repository, Hartford Connecticut (http:\/\/digitalrepository.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/).[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When the case was filed in 1989, there were nineteen children representing ten families. These families were African American, Hispanic, Jewish, and of European ancestry and their socioeconomic status ranged from just making ends meet to living quite comfortably[ref]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sheff, Elizabeth Horton. &#8220;Sheff v. O\u2019Neill: The Struggle Continues against School Segregation and Unequal Opportunity.&#8221; <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Voices in Urban Education<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, 2004, 16-21.[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The families lived in different neighborhoods both inside and outside of the city. Even though each family was different, they all had some history of activism in their communities and deeply believed in fighting for \u201cequal access for all children to high-quality, integrated public education[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> These families \u201cbonded from the beginning\u201d and to this day remain committed to the Sheff movement[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Sheff case was filed in April 1989. The basis for the case revolves around three provisions of the Connecticut State Constitution:<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_13587\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-13587\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/Screen-Shot-2016-04-20-at-11.03.15-AM.png\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-13587\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-13587\" src=\"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/Screen-Shot-2016-04-20-at-11.03.15-AM-300x290.png\" alt=\"The Sheff vs. O\u2019Neill Complaint filed in 1989 Source: Trinity College Digital Repository \" width=\"300\" height=\"290\" srcset=\"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/Screen-Shot-2016-04-20-at-11.03.15-AM-300x290.png 300w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/Screen-Shot-2016-04-20-at-11.03.15-AM-32x32.png 32w, https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/files\/2016\/04\/Screen-Shot-2016-04-20-at-11.03.15-AM.png 540w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-13587\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Sheff vs. O\u2019Neill Complaint filed in 1989<br \/>Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/digitalrepository.trincoll.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&amp;context=cssp_archives\">Trinity College Digital Repository<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Article First, Section 1, which declares all people are equal; Article First, Section 20, which prohibits segregation and discrimination; and Article Eighth, section 1, which\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">mandates \u201cfree public elementary and secondary schools\u201d and names the Connecticut General Assembly responsible with ensuring this social benefit for all children[ref]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Shelf, Elizabeth Horton. &#8220;Sheff v. O\u2019Neill: The Struggle Continues against School Segregation and Unequal Opportunity.&#8221; <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Voices in Urban Education<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, 2004, 16-21.[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The case made three legal claims of inequality that proved that Hartford Schools were failing its students.\u00a0<\/span>These claims were:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The educational achievement of children in the Hartford school district is unequal to the nearby surrounding communities and \u201cthe State of Connecticut, by tolerating school districts sharply segregated along racial, ethnic, and economic lines, has deprived the plaintiffs and other Hartford children of their rights to an equal educational opportunity[ref]Sheff v. O\u2019Neill complaint (Connecticut Superior Court 1989). Available from the Trinity College Digital Repository, Hartford, Connecticut (http:\/\/digitalrepository.trincoll.edu)[\/ref]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The defendants \u201chave long been aware of the educational necessity for racial, ethnic, and economic integration in public schools,\u201d and have recognized the \u201clasting harm inflicted on poor and minority students by the maintenance of isolated urban school districts.\u201d Yet despite their knowledge, they \u201chave failed to act effectively to provide equal educational opportunity to the plaintiffs and other Hartford schoolchildren[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cThe Connecticut Constitution assures to every Connecticut child, in every city and town, an equal opportunity to education\u201d and \u201cthis lawsuit is brought to secure this basic constitutional right for plaintiffs and all Connecticut schoolchildren[ref]Ib.Id.[\/ref].\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because this case involved advocating for Hartford children, the group worked with the lawyers to devise a legal strategy that would help the community. Together, as a coalition, they worked with the community to raise awareness and allow others to participate by lending their support. Elizabeth Horton Sheff is very adamant when she says that \u201c[she] never did it for [her] child[ref]Sheff, Elizabeth Horton. &#8220;Sheff v. O\u2019Neill: The Struggle Continues against School Segregation and Unequal Opportunity.&#8221; <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Voices in Urban Education<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, 2004, 16-21.[\/ref]<\/span>.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> She goes on to describe how \u201cMilo never went to a magnet school. He was out of school before we\u2026 really even got to that stage of now implementing a decision\u2026 but, I never did it for my child, I did it for our kids[ref]Ib.Id.<span style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\/ref]<\/span>.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> While many of the plaintiffs in the suit never saw much of the direct results of the rulings in the case in their schools, they maintained their commitment to the case in order to help all students, present and future, receive the best education they can, regardless of where they lived, their race, or their socioeconomic status. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>\u201cI never did it for my child, I did it for our kids.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Through the long journey and wait for a ruling, the group worked tirelessly to gain the support of the local community in the city, as well as the suburbs. Through numerous meetings at churches, community centers, schools, government agencies, and many more, these plaintiffs stood strong with the overall goal to improve the education for Connecticut\u2019s children. Even though the case lost in the lower court, the group appealed the decision to the Connecticut Supreme Court. In July of 1996, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in their favor on the basis of Count 2, upholding the claim that segregation based on race and ethnicity in Hartford schools was a violation of the Connecticut constitutional rights of Hartford schoolchildren[ref]Eaton, Susan. <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The children in room E4: American education on trial<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. Algonquin Books, 2009.<\/span>[\/ref].<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The opinion read, \u201cthe public elementary and high school students in Hartford suffer daily from the devastating effects that racial and ethnic isolation, as well as poverty, have had on their education\u2026 we hold today that the needy schoolchildren of Hartford have waited long enough[ref]Sheff, Elizabeth Horton. &#8220;Sheff v. O\u2019Neill: The Struggle Continues against School Segregation and Unequal Opportunity.&#8221; <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Voices in Urban Education<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, 2004, 16-21.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\/ref]<\/span>.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Along with this ruling, the court ordered the executive branch of the Connecticut General Assembly to execute its findings. Yet, even though the plaintiffs had this landmark Supreme Court decision, their fight did not stop there and they turned back to the community to continue fighting for social change for their kids and for the community to participate in demanding this change from the state. Even with this ruling in hand, the road to desegregated schools is long and hard, as the Sheff plaintiffs have seen, and the fight continues, to this very day. Yet even so, Elizabeth Horton Sheff and many others trudge on in search for equal education for all children of Connecticut. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The landmark Connecticut Supreme Court case, Sheff v. O\u2019Neill, filed in 1989 on behalf of children in the Hartford school district, was monumental in working towards erasing segregation in Hartford schools. This case was filed on the basis that Hartford children, who were overwhelmingly Black and Hispanic, were receiving an unfair public education because of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/2016\/04\/20\/a-fearless-leader-the-story-of-elizabeth-horton-sheff\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">1989: A Fearless Leader: The Story of Elizabeth Horton Sheff<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1046,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[139],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1046"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13583"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13642,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13583\/revisions\/13642"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/cssp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}