{"id":5547,"date":"2014-02-24T02:18:26","date_gmt":"2014-02-24T07:18:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/?p=5547"},"modified":"2014-03-06T00:08:35","modified_gmt":"2014-03-06T05:08:35","slug":"the-cartel-gives-a-one-sided-incomplete-view-of-americas-public-education-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/2014\/02\/the-cartel-gives-a-one-sided-incomplete-view-of-americas-public-education-system\/","title":{"rendered":"“The Cartel” : Propaganda for Pro-School Choice Movement?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In \u00a02009, news anchor Bob Bowdon wrote, directed, and produced The Cartel<\/em>, an award winning documentary that offers a critical view of the American public education system by examining issues plaguing the schools of New Jersey, a state ranked number one for per pupil spending in the United States. \u00a0Using interviews, news clips, data from international and national test scores, and statistics about school funding, Bowdon weaves together a tragic story of New Jersey\u2019s students floundering and trying to escape from the failing public schools that are rampant with bad teachers and bureaucratic corruption.\u00a0In this film, Bowdon attempts to convince viewers of the negative effects of teacher unions and school officials who control public education, \u201ca multi-billion dollar cartel\u201d, and advocates for market-based reform based on school choice and accountability.<\/p>\n

The documentary begins with a statistic that \u201conly 38% of high school seniors can read at 8th<\/sup> grade level\u201d ( Bowdon, 00:01:26)\u00a0\u00a0to shock the audience into awareness of exactly how bad the public schools are doing. After doling out more statistics about falling test scores to expose the poor quality of education in public schools, Bowdon informs viewers about the amount of spending per classroom annually to make his first point: government spending on education is excessive and pumping more money into schools is not the solution. He uses New Jersey as the perfect example of this, revealing that despite the exorbitant amounts that the state spends on education, the schools are failing their students.<\/p>\n

Given this juxtaposition of quality of education versus the public expenditure on schools, viewers naturally would be wondering :\u00a0where is the $300,000 – $400,000 spent per classroom actually going if not to improve the quality of education? Bowdon highlights news stories of local corruption and interviews public officials and schools administrators to show that the money is either being ill-spent or pocketed by \u201ccigar-chomping superintendents\u201d and other such school bureaucrats.\u00a0According to the documentary, the overpaid administrators and teachers care more about lining their pockets than looking out for the interests of students and that they aren\u2019t being held accountable . Such reports of corruption at the expense of the students and their parents no doubt will elicit the concern and anger of indignant viewers.<\/p>\n

Bowdon then accusingly turns towards the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA), New Jersey\u2019s teacher Union that appears to be obstructing necessary reform measures, such as getting rid of tenure and giving merit-based pay to teachers. He suggests that the politically powerful NJEA, by protecting bad teachers and blocking the movement for vouchers and charter schools are denying parents better education choices for their children and increasing educational inequality. The film\u2019s most emotionally moving scene takes place at the lottery for a charter school when big tears begin to roll down the face of a little girl who appears extremely heartbroken because she failed to escape the horrible New Jersey public school system (Bowdon, 01:17:51).<\/p>\n

\"Crying<\/a>
(01:17:51)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Bowdon’s advocacy for school choice and accountability as the\u00a0solution to ensure quality education for students is aligned with the notion of market-based reforms. He uses his documentary to show that\u00a0<\/span>vouchers and charters schools, such as the Northstar Academy in New Jersey where students are \u201ctrained in behaviors of the professional world\u201d (Bowdon, 01:10:45) and are therefore prepared to succeed in a capitalist society. Although there is no shortage of references to how a school should be run like a business, such as car dealerships and coffee shops, Bowdon fails to address the negative effects of school choice and schools being run like businesses. On its sister website, <\/span>www.thecartelmovie.com<\/a>, viewers are encouraged to \u201clearn about charter schools, vouchers, and other educational alternatives\u2014and support the efforts of groups such as the\u00a0<\/span>Alliance for School Choice<\/a>, New Jersey’s\u00a0<\/span>Excellent Education for Everyone<\/a>, the\u00a0<\/span>National Alliance for Public Charter Schools<\/a>, the\u00a0<\/span>Center for Education Reform<\/a>, and the\u00a0<\/span>Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The Cartel<\/i> won numerous prizes, which they listed on their <\/span>website<\/a>, and appeared to be well received by the public. The New York Post which stated, \u201cFor parents of kids in public schools, the heartbreaking documentary \u2018The Cartel\u2019 is a revelation\u201d and that \u201cfew documentaries have covered such an important matter so convincingly and with such clarity\u201d (Smith, 2010). New Jersey Governor Chris Christie also praised the film as \u201cvery important\u201d and claimed it helped mold his policy decisions (BowdonMedia, 2011).<\/span><\/p>\n

Aside from its poor video quality and bad animations, the film was criticized for a number of things ranging from its biased, limited interviews, its failure to offer the opposing side of the story, to its implicit messages. The\u00a0lack of debate and one-sidedness in this documentary is apparent as Bowdon interviews very few members of \u00a0the opposition and only speaks to frustrated teachers and administrators who have failed to help reform schools from within. He also does not mention past reform efforts that\u00a0\u00a0have\u00a0possibly influenced the negative educational outcomes seen today, such as the No Child Left Behind policy. It is clear that Bowden\u2019s interviews and news clips are not meant to offer the audience a variety of views on the issues of public education. Rather, Bowdon takes a biased approach in which he is \u201ccherry-picking\u201d and guiding interviewees to share opinions and evidence that support his view, and in some cases goes as far as to put words in people\u2019s mouth, so to speak (Bowdon, 2009) (00:25:02 ; 01:01:06). According to the New York Times movie review, \u201cMr.Bowdon \u2026employs an expose-style narration lousy with ad hominems and emotional coercion\u201d (Catsoulis, 2010).<\/span><\/p>\n

In response to Bowdon\u2019s pro school choice push, Stephen Whitty, a reporter for the Star Ledger, a Newark based online newspaper, gives reasons for why school choice might not solve the national education mess. According to Whitty (2009), Bowdon ignored issues of whether charter schools are any better as well as the problem of their \u201cself-selecting nature\u201d as only certain parents would take advantage of such schools. Whitty also asks, \u201cWhat if the vouchers didn\u2019t cover the tuition at the prep you wanted, or the school didn\u2019t want your child? How about that whole pesky church-state thing\u2026?\u201d (2009). Whitty also discloses that Bowdon got \u201cpost-production support from a couple of partisan groups, including a pro-voucher organization\u201d (2009).<\/p>\n

In her book The Reign of Error: the Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools<\/span>, education historian, professor, and policy analyst Diane Ravitch points to how the charter movement has become “a vehicle for privatization of large swaths of public education” which results in a loss of the democratic control of schools and creates a system in which charters competes with rather than complementing and collaborating with public schools (2013). She reveals that charter schools under private management, which have not produced consistent high scores nor proven their superiority over public schools, are exempt from state laws and financial auditing and actually spend more public dollars on their students than public schools (Ravitch, 2013). She also warns of the danger they pose in increasing racial and class segregation( Ravitch, 2013).<\/p>\n

According to Harvard Educational Review (Brion-Meisels, 2011) the kind of charter schools and reforms that Bowdon praises makes clear some implicit messages of the film. Firstly, it sends the message that the purpose of public education is simply to give students equal access to economic opportunity (Brion-Meisels, 2011). Secondly, it sends the message that \u201cthe culture of high-accountability charter schools is more valuable than the cultures from which these low-income students may come\u201d and devalues the culturally unique ways in which these students\u2019 parents support them (Brion-Meisels,2011).<\/span><\/p>\n

Using test scores as the measure for success, <\/span>The Cartel<\/i> paints a dismal picture of public schools in New Jersey to imply that public schools throughout the nation are failing horribly and that a market-based approach to reform would reduce the costly inefficiencies. He focuses only on the misfortunes of one State and claims that this story is equally true for schools throughout the nation. Though the statistics Bowdon uses to win his audience over are verifiable and come from legitimate resources, he fails to tell the story behind these numbers that put them in a real world context that would lead to an accurate understanding of what they mean. Bowdon’s poorly made documentary appears to be nothing more than a biased propaganda for the school choice movement leading towards the privatization of the public education system.\u00a0The real threat of misleading documentaries like this one lays in the fact that it might prevent people from the true underlying causes of the public education mess in America, such as the systemic economic and social inequalities that exist.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b>Sources:<\/b><\/p>\n

Bowdon,B. (Director). (2009). The Cartel [Documentary].United States: Moving Picture Institute<\/p>\n

BowdonMedia. (2011, January 2). Chris Christie comments on The Cartel movie. <\/i>Retrieved February 23, 2013, from http:\/\/youtu.be\/-9KY8uAxIJA<\/a><\/p>\n

Brion-Meisels, G. (2011). The Cartel\/The Lottery\/Waiting for \u201cSuperman”\u2026. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 751-761.<\/p>\n

Catsoulis, J. (2010, April 15). Children left behind. New York Times.<\/i> Retrieved from http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/04\/16\/movies\/16cartel.html?_r=0<\/a><\/p>\n

Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools<\/i>. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.<\/p>\n

Smith, K. (2010, April 16). Nj paradox: Piles of cash, failing schools.\u00a0New York Post<\/i>, Retrieved from http:\/\/nypost.com\/2010\/04\/16\/nj-paradox-piles-of-cash-failing-schools\/<\/p>\n

Whitty, S. (2009, Octber 08). ‘the cartel’ movie review: Documentary on jersey schools fails debate class. The Star Ledger.<\/i> Retrieved from http:\/\/www.nj.com\/entertainment\/tv\/index.ssf\/2009\/10\/the_cartel_movie_review_docume.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In \u00a02009, news anchor Bob Bowdon wrote, directed, and produced The Cartel, an award winning documentary that offers a critical view of the American public education system by examining issues plaguing the schools of New Jersey, a state ranked number one for per pupil spending in the United States. \u00a0Using interviews, news clips, data from … Continue reading “The Cartel” : Propaganda for Pro-School Choice Movement?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":731,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63,65],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5547"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/731"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5547"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5547\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5689,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5547\/revisions\/5689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/commons.trincoll.edu\/edreform\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}