<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trinity Banter | Danyelle Doldoorian | Activity</title>
	<link>https://commons.trincoll.edu/members/ddoldoor/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://commons.trincoll.edu/members/ddoldoor/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Danyelle Doldoorian.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:53:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=9.2.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">70d7b71725876a054e3e75412b966be0</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian wrote a new post, Global, Historical Influences from 1940 through the 1980s on the Addition of Departments and Programs at Trinity College, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/05/global-historical-influences-from-1940-through-the-1980s-on-the-addition-of-departments-and-programs-at-t</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:34:09 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone were to compare the curriculum of Trinity College from 1900 to its curriculum now in 2012, he or she would see few similarities.  In the 1900 curriculum he or she may see a department of Hygiene but such a department would not be found in the 2012 curriculum, and in 2012 he or [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">44e86b83583b43be31ce1c5a71f2474a</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian wrote a new post, Trinity departments and programs, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/05/research-presentation/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:07:13 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nKPZSH3y1xwMZ1ZdKP4Ptg6_cmtzNc3NpATO-Uzkrbg/edit#slide=id.p" rel="nofollow ugc">Research presentation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d25518390fc92f016a5285ff16e0b1d2</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian commented on the post, Working Thesis and Evidence Draft , on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/working-thesis-and-evidence-draft/#comment-2977</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:49:19 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine, I thought this draft was great! You have definitely done your research and know exactly where you are headed in this paper. You hooked me early on when you noted &#8220;neither college strove to admit women on the basis of equal opportunity for all, but for personal advancement and competitive reasons.&#8221; This was really [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3a0299326224f6f7375f08cbba279fa</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian commented on the post, Coeducation Thesis &#38; Evidence Draft, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/coeducation-thesis-evidence-draft/#comment-2976</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:33:14 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this topic and I think it will turn out to be an excellent paper. I like how you are using Trinity as your specific topic but your frame of reference spans all institutions which went from single-sex colleges to coeducational institutions. Your topic is definitely thought-provoking, but try to add a little [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2cff8d56df9175a47f0ccd6525460d16</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian wrote a new post, Trinity&#039;s Department and Program Addition Thesis and Evidence Proposal, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/trinitys-department-and-program-addition-thesis-and-evidence-proposal/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 02:51:37 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were to compare the curriculum of Trinity College in 1930 to Trinity’s curriculum now in 2012, you would notice that they looked almost nothing alike.  In the 1930 curriculum, you would see no mention of “Computer Science,” “Women, Gender, and Sexuality,” or even “International Relations,” and you would see over twenty new departments [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">828e628fcb5278a38d70795c8d01a13d</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian wrote a new post, Addition of Departments/Programs to Trinity throughout History, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/research-proposal-3/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:32:18 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danyelle Doldoorian April 4th, 2012 EDUC 300 Research Proposal <strong>Research Question: </strong> When and why were new departments/program created over time at Trinity College? <strong>Significance:</strong> Researching the connection between what and when departments/programs are added and what was happening at the time of addition, it is very evident that Trinity’s department/program additions reflect student demand and events current [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0e28ea9fc63d741d15a3d730672706c4</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian wrote a new post, Education Discussion Hits “Home”, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/education-discussion-hits-%e2%80%9chome%e2%80%9d/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:06:49 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/files/2012/02/attachment-1024x768.jpg" width="133.33333333333" height="100" alt="Thumbnail" /><strong>HARTFORD</strong>&#8212; This past Monday, February 27, 2012, a discussion was held regarding the report <strong><em><a href="http://www.cahs.org/pdf/OpportunityInCT.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">Opportunity in CT: The Impact of Race, Poverty a </a></em></strong><a href="http://www.cahs.org/pdf/OpportunityInCT.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc"><strong><em>nd Education on Family Economic Success </em></strong> </a>written by Judith Carol and published and sponsored by the <a href="http://www.cahs.org/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">Connecticut Association for Human Services </a> (CAHS).  The discussion, held in the Old Judiciary Room of the State Capitol, was facilitated by [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b42b49aae39b98c5df3461414f9ece1c</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian wrote a new post, Plagiarism exercise, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/1122/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:29:52 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Example 1 </strong>: Plagiarize the original text by copying portions of it word-for-word. Truly, no measure is perfect.  But the estimates of value-added and other “growth models,” which attempt to isolate the “true effect” of an individual teacher through his or her students’ test scores, are alarmingly error-prone in any given year. <strong>Example 2 </strong>: Plagiarize the original text [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f1e6bfe65fcf0865fd90ff8a64b794a</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian commented on the post, &#34;The Lottery&#34;, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/the-lottery/#comment-234</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:24:21 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this essay, it seemed apparent to me that The Lottery and American Teacher were very different but did have similarities. The Lottery seemed to focus all of its time on families and parents, whereas American Teacher focused its time on the teachers inside the schools. Also, The Lottery seems like a cry for better [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2fe6f6b3baad0ff4e96e07c84f50ab01</guid>
				<title>Danyelle Doldoorian commented on the post, Waiting for Superman , on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/waiting-for-superman-5/#comment-229</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:58:57 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was a great essay, especially because, never having seen the film, I was able to easily understand the workings of the film. This film, Waiting for Superman, clearly had similarities and differences to American Teacher, the film about which I wrote. Waiting for Superman was all about the students. It showed the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>