<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trinity Banter | Devon MacGillivray | Activity</title>
	<link>https://commons.trincoll.edu/members/dmacgil2/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://commons.trincoll.edu/members/dmacgil2/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Devon MacGillivray.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:53:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=9.2.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f42e3615ca5a3f8b47c613d527171b2</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray wrote a new post, Coeducation in Colleges, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/05/coeducation-in-colleges-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 06:24:18 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/files/2012/05/Screen-Shot-2012-05-03-at-1.14.37-AM-300x283.png" width="106.00706713781" height="100" alt="Thumbnail" />Having officially accepted women to their undergraduate program in 1837, Oberlin College was the first university postsecondary institution to become coeducational. Following Oberlin, other colleges across the United States began to open their doors to female undergraduates. However there were some universities that stayed single-sex, such as the Seven Sister schools, which praised all-female education, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be6f167355025cbebf2f2566492acbef</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray wrote a new post, Coeducation of Trinity College, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/05/coeducation-of-trinity-college/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:42:19 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/files/2012/05/Research-Presentation.pptx" rel="nofollow ugc">Research Presentation</a></p>
<p><a href="http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/files/2012/05/Major-Data-1989-2011.xlsx" rel="nofollow ugc">Major Data 1989-2011</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">11ca4f6fe00ab9c4811144a2a47f60a7</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray commented on the post, Working Thesis and Evidence Draft , on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/working-thesis-and-evidence-draft/#comment-2971</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:09 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine- The section in which you talk about the individual characters of Amherst women, I don&#8217;t think you should make the generalized assumption that it made them tougher, unless you read that somewhere. That kind of assumption might weaken your argument if it&#8217;s not factually based. Other than that I think you should try and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">98ed6fd59973fd993e5676d21146ca3e</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray commented on the post, Trinity&#039;s Department and Program Addition Thesis and Evidence Proposal, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/trinitys-department-and-program-addition-thesis-and-evidence-proposal/#comment-2969</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:22:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danyelle, Your topic definitely interests me because it&#8217;s so close to my own, but I like what you have done so far with focusing on the important/generation-specific changes. The only thing I noticed was that it seemed kind of listy, so if you could just build a stronger transition between the subjects, that would make [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2c9a06feb506060fb3817ecfc6efc1e</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray wrote a new post, Coeducation Thesis &#38; Evidence Draft, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/coeducation-thesis-evidence-draft/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:57:17 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having officially accepted women to their undergraduate program in 1837, Oberlin College was the first university postsecondary institution to become coeducational. Following Oberlin, other colleges across the United States began to open their doors to female undergraduates. However there were some universities that stayed single-sex, such as the Seven Sister schools, which praised all-female education, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1a422478802e066ab20ab709dd6ee5ab</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray wrote a new post, Coeducation in Colleges, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/04/coeducation-in-colleges/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:18:20 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devon MacGillivray Ed 300 Research Proposal 4/4/12 <span>Research Question </span> <em>How did the acceptance of women to Trinity affect the structure of each major? Did certain majors become either male or female-dominated? If so, what reasons might the majors attract one gender versus the other? Why? </em> <em> </em> <em> </em> <span>Relevance </span> Having researched admissions statistics when the class was assigned to analyze Trinity [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">922f856688a39900b8589c783b6587de</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray wrote a new post, Avoiding Plagiarism Exercise, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/avoiding-plagiarism-exercise-4/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:54:14 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Example 1: <span>Plagiarize</span> the original text by copying portions of it word-for-word. A teacher who gets a particular ranking in year one is likely to get a different ranking the next year. There will always be instability in these rankings, some of which will reflect “real” performance changes. But it is difficult to trust any performance [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cdf5a5227dab62a629cec983df7d18ef</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray commented on the post, Waiting for Superman, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/waiting-for-superman-3/#comment-206</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:05:30 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as in The Lottery, it appears as though Waiting for Superman focuses on the importance of bettering the education system by offering an education taught by excellent teachers. I found Bobby’s comparison of teachers to Superman intriguing, because if offers an alternative view of educators. Instead of people who are “only” working to improve [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d3014ed25f50f477fbedc813f3059c47</guid>
				<title>Devon MacGillivray commented on the post, American Teacher, on the site Educ 300: Education Reform, Past and Present</title>
				<link>http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/american-teacher-2/#comment-204</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:34:18 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having watched a documentary that focused primarily on how students benefit from better education, it is interesting to see that American Teacher focuses on how teachers directly impact these students. The statistic showing that “an excellent teacher can improve a student’s future income by almost $20,000” is astounding. The goal of Harlem Succe&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2151"><a href="http://commons.trincoll.edu/edreform/2012/02/american-teacher-2/#comment-204" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>