Comparing Various Mapping Tools

Posted on

MapMe

BatchGeo

Google Fusion Tables

Of the three mapping programs, BatchGeo was my favorite. In addition to being the most aesthetically pleasing, it was by far the easiest to use. I was easily able to import my data and I did not have to reformat my Excel document in any way. However, the free version does not support more than 250 entires, so I was not able to geocode all food establishments in Hartford. Thus, I chose to just map restaurants around Trinity. I also appreciate that BatchGeo uses Google Maps as its source.

On the other hand, MapMe was the most difficult. In order to import data, I had to download their Excel template, and then I had to transfer all of my data into the template for it to be imported. This took a considerable amount of time.

In regards to Google Fusion Tables, I’m not exactly sure how I feel yet. I think that it is the most difficult to learn, but will eventually yield the best results once learned. I have just learned how to set a column to “location” and I am still struggling to embed this map.

Published by

Kaitlyn Sprague

Senior Public Policy and Law Major at Trinity College in Hartford, CT

One thought on “Comparing Various Mapping Tools”

  1. Kaitlyn, we were impressed that you created the three point maps with real data for your community partner. But your Google Fusion Table embedded map is not visible to the public, probably because you did not modify the Share settings. Please try to fix that, and contact Veronica if you need help.

Comments are closed.